Changes proposed for trains in the UK
Fare evasion is a crime and costs Britain’s railway hundreds of millions of pounds each year in lost revenue. But train operators need to be doing more to make it easier for travel, a new review has found.
Rail regulator, the Office of Rail and Road, found significant inconsistency in approaches to revenue protection across the network, leading to very different outcomes for passengers.
The regulator said there are also clear areas where better information would help passengers buy the right ticket, and where they need to understand their rights, plus what options they have if action is taken against them for suspected fare evasion.
The regulator also called for more scope to improve fairness for passengers making honest mistakes, while helping the industry better address fare evasion, and deal with those who attempt to defraud the railway.
“Fare evasion is a crime and costs Britain’s railway hundreds of millions of pounds each year in lost revenue. But while train operators have stepped up revenue protection efforts in recent years, safeguards to ensure passengers are treated consistently and fairly when subject to enforcement action have not kept pace,” the regulator said.
“ORR’s comprehensive investigation looked at the root causes of what leads to passengers travelling without a valid ticket, and how the industry responds to this.”
Key recommendations
The report identifies several areas for improvement and makes targeted recommendations that will address these issues. These recommendations include:
- Make buying the right ticket simpler and easier: Give passengers clearer information about conditions or restrictions when they are buying a ticket, for example, permitted routes, time restrictions or the use of railcards. This will help reduce confusion and unintentional mistakes.
- Strengthen consistency in how passengers are treated when ticket issues arise: Passengers should be treated fairly and consistently when they are found without a valid ticket, with industry focusing on targeting intentional fare evasion, as opposed to genuine mistakes, and responding proportionately.
- Introduce greater consistency and fairness in the use of prosecutions: Establish a consistent test for prosecution across all operators, ensuring cases only proceed when clearly justified and in the public interest.
- Make information on revenue protection easy to access and understand: Information should clearly set out passengers’ rights and how penalties, prosecutions, out-of-court settlements and appeals work.
- Greater coordination, oversight and transparency of revenue protection activity: Establish an appropriate forum or body tasked with identifying and promoting best practices across all aspects of revenue protection policy and enforcement.
“Effective revenue protection is essential for a sustainable railway, but it must be fair and proportionate for passengers. Our recommendations aim to protect both industry revenue and support passenger confidence,” said Stephanie Tobyn (ORR’s Director of Strategy, Policy and Reform).
“Our evidence shows a system that has evolved over time where the legal framework and enforcement processes are increasingly complex and appear weighted towards industry, leaving some passengers who make innocent errors vulnerable to disproportionate outcomes. But meanwhile, fare evasion remains a significant problem, and rigorous action should be taken against those who intentionally seek to defraud the railway.”
