Business

AI-generated CVs are slowing down hiring in the UK

Ryan Brothwell 2 min read
AI-generated CVs are slowing down hiring in the UK

Key Points

  • Two-thirds of UK hiring managers (67%) say screening for AI-written applications has lengthened the time it takes to hire.
  • Nearly half of employers (48%) said AI-generated CVs and application materials are creating notable challenges for their organisation.
  • The tools are producing a high volume of generic CVs and cover letters, along with fabricated or embellished work histories.
  • Not every AI-assisted application is misleading, and many candidates use the tools to tidy up clarity or grammar rather than to invent experience.

Two-thirds of UK hiring managers (67%) say screening for AI-written applications has lengthened the time it takes to hire, according to new research from recruitment firm Robert Half.

The firm surveyed 500 hiring managers and 1,000 professionals in June 2026, and found that only 10% of professionals use no AI at any stage of a job application.

Nearly half of employers (48%) said AI-generated CVs and application materials are creating notable challenges for their organisation.

Robert Half said the tools are producing a high volume of generic CVs and cover letters, along with fabricated or embellished work histories, which makes it harder for employers to judge whether a candidate’s stated experience matches their actual skills.

“When large volumes of applications appear highly polished or follow near-identical formats, it becomes harder to evaluate candidates, validate skills and experience and confidently identify the strongest fit for the role,” said Matt Weston, senior managing director for UK and Ireland at Robert Half.

Employers pointed to several factors that are slowing down candidate validation and stretching hiring timelines, including:

  • Managing an increased volume of applications from unqualified candidates (28%)
  • Distinguishing between AI-generated and authentic CVs (27%)
  • Needing additional in-person interviews or screening to validate candidates’ skills and experience (23%)
  • Spending more time verifying candidate credentials (23%)

The firm added that not every AI-assisted application is misleading, and many candidates use the tools to tidy up clarity or grammar rather than to invent experience.

The survey covered professionals working in finance and accounting, technology and IT, marketing and creative, legal, administrative and customer support, and HR.

“Technology can support the process, but employers still need experienced professionals to evaluate candidates, validate skills and make informed hiring decisions without unnecessary delays,” Weston added.

Now read: Bad news for Brits stuck talking to AI chatbots