1 in 5 UK bosses have already cut jobs because of AI

One in five UK employers have already made roles redundant or reduced hiring specifically because of AI.

The finding comes from a new tracker by the Policy Institute at King’s College London, with fieldwork conducted by Opinium between 20 and 29 April 2026.

The research surveyed 506 senior decision-makers at UK businesses with 11 or more employees, sampled to ensure broad representation across business size, sector and region.

It sits alongside parallel surveys of 2,000 UK adults, 1,002 young people aged 16 to 29 and 1,000 university students.

Among employers, 22% confirmed they have either made roles redundant or scaled back recruitment as a direct result of AI adoption. A further 3% said they did not know, and 75% said they had not.

The likelihood of cuts rises sharply with organisation size. Just 9% of small employers with 11 to 49 staff have made AI-related redundancies or hiring reductions, compared with 24% of medium-sized firms with 50 to 249 staff, 29% of large organisations with 250 to 999 staff and 23% of corporate employers with 1,000 or more employees.

The data suggests larger firms, with more white-collar roles and more capacity to integrate AI at scale, are moving fastest.

Among employers who have already reduced headcount because of AI, the picture is mixed. A third (33%) say it has improved efficiency with no significant downsides.

A near-identical 32% report that efficiency gains have come alongside new problems such as skills gaps, lower morale or loss of institutional knowledge.

A further 18% say it has had little noticeable effect so far, and 12% say it has created more problems than it has solved. Just 6% said it was too early to say.

Half of all employers (50%) say making staff redundant because of AI would be either a straightforward business decision (30%) or a positive step for the organisation’s efficiency (20%).

Only 17% say they would find it a very difficult decision and try to avoid redundancies, while 28% would find it uncomfortable but accept it if necessary for the business.

Pressure from above

Almost two-thirds (64%) of employers say investors, shareholders or senior leadership are encouraging them to use AI, rising to 71% among large and corporate organisations.

Just 9% of employers report being discouraged. Small employers are the most likely to report receiving no clear guidance, with 38% saying so, double the proportion of large and corporate organisations (19%).

Concern about the downstream effects is growing. Employers are split on whether losing junior roles to AI will threaten their ability to develop senior talent, with 48% concerned and 44% not.

Among corporate employers with 1,000 or more staff, concern rises to 62%, with 18% very concerned. Just 33% of small employers express the same concern.

The cuts come despite widespread reported productivity gains. Almost nine in ten (86%) employers say AI has led to productivity improvements, with 44% citing significant improvements and 42% citing modest ones.

The most common results of those gains were further technology investment (41%), staff focusing on higher-value work (40%) and improved products or services (37%).

Only 14% of employers said the gains had led to increased pay or bonuses for staff.

Now read: Waymo is finally crossing the Atlantic – London robotaxis launch in 2026