Politics

The UK’s ‘optional’ digital ID isn’t looking very optional for workers

Ryan Brothwell 3 min read
The UK’s ‘optional’ digital ID isn’t looking very optional for workers

The UK government is pushing ahead with a national digital ID scheme that it insists is entirely voluntary. But for millions of workers and the employers who hire them, the reality on the ground could look very different.

In a consultation launched earlier this month, the government has emphasised that the new digital ID will be free, with “no legal obligation” for individuals to sign up and no requirement that public services depend on it.

The scheme, detailed in a document published on 10 March 2026, aims to make accessing government services easier via a mobile app or computer while improving security and inclusivity.

Yet employment lawyers and HR professionals are already warning that the optional label comes with a significant caveat when it comes to the workplace.

The right-to-work reality check

The government has backtracked from earlier plans to make digital ID mandatory for proving the right to work. Originally floated as a requirement by July 2029, ministers performed a U-turn in January 2026, clarifying that British citizens and others won’t be forced to obtain the digital credential just to get a job.

However, it is important to note that the Government is still committed to making digital right-to-work checks mandatory, apart from in certain exceptional circumstances, notes legal firm Lewis Silkin.

According to the consultation document, the digital ID will be free to access for those who want it but there will be no legal obligation for people to have it and access to public services will not be made dependent on having it. 

The system will be based on three core principles: 

  1. It must be useful, i.e. easier to use than the current paper-based system;
  2. It must be inclusive, i.e. accessible for everyone; and
  3. It must be trusted, i.e. underpinned by robust data security.

Employers will increasingly be expected to verify identity and work eligibility through the digital system rather than relying solely on paper documents or manual checks.

This creates a practical pressure point. While workers aren’t legally required to have a digital ID, employers facing streamlined digital verification processes may naturally prefer, or even require, candidates who can provide it quickly and seamlessly.

Those without it could face delays, additional scrutiny, or simply be at a competitive disadvantage in a tight labour market.

What the consultation actually asks

The eight-week consultation, open until 5 May 2026, seeks views across several areas, including:

  • The design and governance of the system;
  • Challenges businesses may face in carrying out fully digital right-to-work checks;
  • Barriers to inclusivity (particularly for those who may struggle with digital access);
  • Security, privacy, and data protection safeguards.

Responses can be submitted online, by email, or post. A “People’s Panel” of around 100-120 randomly selected citizens will also provide recommendations by mid-June.

The digital ID proposal has already attracted controversy, with a parliamentary petition against it gathering nearly three million signatures. Privacy advocates worry about mission creep, while others question whether a voluntary system can deliver the efficiency gains the government promises.

Ministers insist the scheme will give people more choice rather than remove it. But as the consultation progresses, the line between voluntary and practically necessary, especially in the jobs market, will be one to watch.

It is intended to roll out by the end of the current Parliament, subject to legislation.

Now read: British optimism about economy hits record lows